Harold Morgan

 © 2021 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES        3/22/21
Velarde legislator proposes legislative Rural Opportunity Committee
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
For the state’s COVID year of 2020, the unemployment rate climbed from 5.1% in January 2020 to 8.7% (seasonally adjusted) in January 2021. That rate change bumped us up to fourth place nationally in unemployment in January, a ranking we know well, behind California, Hawaii and New York.
During the year employment dropped 40,000 from 915,000 in January 2020 to 875,000 a year later. The labor force—people working or looking for work—only declined 7,000 in 2020 to 959,000.
That the labor force dropped much less than employment suggests some lurking optimism. If people were giving up, they would leave the labor force when the job went away. Indeed, people forgetting how to work is a worry nationally.
By percentage the biggest losers during 2020 were mining, which is mostly oil and gas, minus 32%, and tourism, minus 30.1%. The official and unhelpful sector names are mining and logging, where the loss was 8,000 jobs to January 2021, a total of 17,000, and leisure and hospitality where employment dropped 29,600 to 68,800.
Six of the eight counties with unemployment more than 10% are rural. They are Taos, 11.9%; Sierra, 10%; McKinley, 12%; Lincoln, 10%; Luna, 17.7%; and Cibola, 11.9%. The other two are Torrance, 10% unemployment and officially part of metro Albuquerque, but really rural, and San Juan, 10.9% unemployment and defined as the Farmington metro area.
These numbers hit the state’s ugliest job metric—the ratio of employment to population where we remain fifth from the bottom at 49.9%. This means that just under half of the main portion of our adults who can work are not employed. While we remain in the same relative position among the states, i.e., toward the bottom, our rebuilding starts from a reduced base due to those 40,000 jobs that went away last year.
Rep. Roger Montoya, Velarde Democrat, has an idea for systematically finding ways to improve our rural areas. Montoya introduced House Memorial 33 to create an interim committee of the Legislature called the Rural Opportunity Committee.
Interim committees are a key tool of the Legislature, used both for developing proposed legislation and providing a platform for people to expound on issues. Interim committees operate between sessions, as the term “interim” suggests, from mid-summer to early December when, in theory, proposed legislation has found a sponsor. Membership mixes geographically and between parties and the House and Senate.
Interim committees provide a mechanism to explore policy issues without the pressure of the legislative session.
Montoya’s home of Velarde lies in a little spur of his district at the north end of the urban corridor stretching to Velarde from Belen. The rest of District 40 is a vast expanse to the east that screams “rural.” The district’s big cities are Angel Fire, Springer, Mora and Wagon Mound.
Montoya’s history brings new views to the Legislature. A professional dancer long ago, Montoya seems a serial entrepreneur for community and arts organizations. Today he is artistic director of Moving Arts Española, a community arts organization, which he co-founded.
HM 33 asks the Legislative Council to create the Rural Opportunity Committee, composed of representatives and senators from each quadrant of the state. It would study issues affecting rural New Mexico, identify barriers to economic and educational opportunities, review tax policy, propose policies, look for money, develop a long-term plan, and propose legislation.
The memorial passed, so look for this committee in the future.
Another place to start the review would be Peter van Dresser’s “Landscape for Humans,” a 1972 study of ecologically guided development potential. Van Dresser knew the territory; he lived in El Rito. The state library should have a copy.


© 2021 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES   3/8/21
New Mexico’s per capita income is 49th nationally, population still shrinking
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Nothing much happened with the state’s population and New Mexican’s income following the census ten years ago. The trend was departure of the most productive adults, those who would build their lives and, along the way, the economy.
A summary retrospective seems appropriate to remind us where we were in the happy pre-COVID days of 2019 when things seemed to be getting a little better. That year real personal income grew a smashing 2% from 2018. The performance left us just a little ahead of our traditional rivals for economic non-performance, Arkansas and Louisiana, but also—surprise—ahead of nine other states.
Median household income hit $51,945 in 2019, reported the Bureau of Economic Analysis with 18% of those households earning between $50,000 and $74,599.
Income averaged $43,326 for each of our 2,096,829 New Mexicans in 2019. Just five counties registered income over the state figure: Los Alamos ($73,821); Santa Fe ($60,276); Eddy ($59,661); Lea ($49,039); and Bernalillo ($45,431). Sandoval County slipped in slightly under the state at $43,125.
Our 2019 income performance put us 49th nationally.
We easily forget that two-thirds of Sandoval residents live in Rio Rancho, 2019 population 99,178. The remaining third of Sandoval’s 146,748 citizens scatter in small communities around the county. Being forgotten is likely pretty annoying to the dozen tribal communities and two joint use areas either entirely or partly in the county.
Pueblos entirely contained in Sandoval County are Jemez, San Felipe, Santa Ana, and Zia. Partly in the county are Cochiti, Jicarilla Apache, Laguna, the Navajo Nation, San Ildefonso, Santa Clara, and Santo Domingo. San Felipe has joint use areas with Santa Ana and Santo Domingo.
Taken together, the tribes would be our second largest group with 183,944 people, behind only Albuquerque, population 560,513.
The Legislature’s discussion of expanding broadband access is good. We talk of being a rural state, but it’s hard to grasp that. Having more people clustered in one placed tends to mean higher incomes.
Here is an anecdotal way to consider broadband. In 2019 New Mexico had seven incorporated places with a two-digit population. Causey, population 98, for example. And 35 places registered a three-digit population. Elida, population 176 in 2019 and dropping, for another example.
Financially, Los Alamos retains its decades long hold on the highest per capita income due to the well paid researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The 2019 per capita income was $73,821, a $13,200, or 22% jump since 2010.  Population offers news here. The county population has been flat to drifting down for some years. Since 2015, the population added 1,566 people for a 9% increase to 19,369 in 2019.
Income growth and population don’t necessarily go together. The numbers for Union County, in the northeast corner of the state, show 11% of the 2010 population having departed over the decade, leaving a 2019 population of 4,059. The money went the other way with a 61% ten-year increase to 37,763 in 2019. The stellar growth leaves Union County income at just over half that in Los Alamos. Growing cattle in the private sector provides, it appears, a quite different return than doing physics and other science for the government in Los Alamos.
Roswell, population 47,551, continues to not quite pass the 50,000 mark needed to become an official metro area. Roswell hosts three-quarters of the Chaves County population of 64,615, which declined 1,105 during the ten years. McKinley County, population 71,367, has about 10% more people than Chaves County, but far fewer in Gallup, the main city, population 21,493.
Meanwhile, if enchantment means empty, counties including Catron, De Baca, Guadalupe, Harding and Hidalgo continue getting more and more enchanted.

© 2021 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES  2/22/21
Slogans are stupid; ideas needed from serious people
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
If slogans aren’t stupid, Susan Stebbing argued, they certainly can be dangerous. Slogans take complex ideas and stuff them into a word or three. The worst of slogan thinking is not thinking at all, but rather people parroting a phrase backed with no thought. Logic must stand behind these phrases.
Stebbing, British philosopher, cited “an urgent need today for the citizens of a democracy to think well,” when she wrote “Thinking to Some Purpose,” first published in 1939.
Slogans bury us. With “Stop the Steal” and more, former President Donald Trump seems the chief culprit, but he is hardly alone. The left offers plenty of choices. Remember “Resist!”
A couple of weeks ago a 40-something couple demonstrated their wacko coolness in front of a vacant Kmart in Albuquerque just south of I-40. The woman, dark haired with pony tail, waved a hand lettered sign saying, “Masks are slavery.” The man paced the sidewalk carrying a large Confederate battle flag. My opinion: To not wear a mask is stupid.
A favorite New Mexico mindless political slogan is “No Tejana Susana.” The Susana here is former Gov. Susana Martinez who was born in El Paso. Former President Bill Clinton pushed the concept of Martinez’s El Paso birthplace being morally uncertain in an Oct. 14, 2010, rally in Española, reported the Albuquerque Journal the next day. That a former president of the United States should repeat such garbage I found amazing.
In a column a few days earlier, the Las Vegas Optic editor said his neighbor posted a sign saying, “No Tejana Susana.” Noting that Diane Denish, Albuquerque resident and Martinez’s Democratic opponent, grew up in Hobbs, five miles from Texas, the Optic editor said Martinez’s birthplace should be off limits.
Behavior beyond complete submission to the slogans, in other words behavior short of complete mindlessness, provokes nasty response.
Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyoming, stepped from the closed Republican corral to vote for Trump’s impeachment. Democrats loved it. Republicans did not, blowing all sorts of corks.
Nebraska’s very conservative Republican Sen. Ben Sasse, got censured by his state party. In a response video, Sasse acknowledged the unhappiness and said, “The anger's always been simply about me not bending the knee to one guy,” adding, “Politics isn’t about the weird worship of one dude.” 
Today in Roswell the party behavior is about the same, though over a different issue. The Chaves County Republican party asked Rep. Phelps Anderson to resign after Anderson moved his registration from Republican to decline-to-state. Anderson’s sin was supporting removing an abortion law outdated by 50 years. Why would a true conservative favor keeping a useless law on the books? Are we not better with fewer laws and more freedom?
A long time ago, around 1980, when New Mexico Republicans occupied a deep hole, the response was a campaign organization outside the party that recruited, trained and financially supported candidates. The requirements were that a potential candidate be a registered Republican, marketable (decent looking, that sort of thing), commit to doing the campaign work, and promise to vote with the Republicans on most of the big ones.
Ideas from serious people are out there, as is the truth.
The George W. Bush Presidential Center in Dallas offers a place to start. The new issue of the center’s online magazine, The Catalyst, discusses the state of the American dream. One article is an interview with former House Speaker Paul Ryan, who has started the American Idea Foundation in his hometown. The foundation identifies and promotes real-world policies demonstrating the dynamism of individuals and communities central to America.
New Mexicans need to find these ideas, borrow them and apply them here.

© 2021 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     2/8/21
Rural New Mexico getting comprehensive attention
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Rural New Mexico is getting organized attention in the current legislative session.
A level of attention isn’t all that new. Programs such as MainStreet have thrown small amounts of money at small towns forever. Digital sound for a Farmington movie theater featured in a Jan. 4 Economic Development Department news release. The release proclaimed excitement at $90,000 for a Lovington wayfinding project. The record shows piecemeal attention with minimal consideration of broadly rural matters.
Rep. Ray Lara, D-Chamberino, and Rep. Rebecca Dow, R-Truth of Consequences, have bigger fish on their platter. Dow recruited Lara to chair the new Rural Caucus. They are interested in what’s really happening.
Rural New Mexico amounts to more than might be thought. While the state has seven counties that the Census Bureau defines as urban, having large counties means that even the officially urban contain much sparsely populated space. Metropolitan Farmington (San Juan County) has nearly all its people living along the Animas and San Juan Rivers. But about half of “metro” Farmington is in the largely very rural Navajo Nation. Other metro counties, except Bernalillo, tell the same story. The 575 area code offers another definition of rural New Mexico, covering about 75% of the state.
People concentrate in the compact Albuquerque and Santa Fe. Accomplishment becomes easier with players handy. Small communities find meeting regulatory and associated complex application requirements difficult. People with expertise go to cities for work and more money. Lara’s home in Chamberino is more than 300 miles from Santa Fe, requiring a drive of about four and a-half hours, depending on speed.
With all this distance, the real world is that the Albuquerque/Santa Fe urban corridor ignores the rural areas, maybe not intentionally, Lara told Walter Rubel of the Southern New Mexico Journalism Collaborative. Sen. Crystal Diamond, R-Elephant Butte, believes the real Legislative divide is rural versus urban. Diamond, a freshman, replaced long-time Sen. John Arthur Smith, whose Deming home is more than 90 miles from Elephant Butte as the crow drives.
Water, property rights and infrastructure investment are among the unifying principles for the caucus. In one of those inevitable collateral effects, marijuana greenhouses and farms use huge amounts of water, possibly depleting small community water supplies.
Collaboration between Diamond and Sen. Síah Correa Hemphill, Silver City Democrat and also a freshman, produced Senate Bill 193 calling for creation of a rural equity ombud in the local government division of the Department of Finance and Administration. The bill text says this individual would “work on issues of concern to rural and frontier communities.”  (For anyone else sometimes baffled by the transmutation of the English language, “ombud” is a gender neutral version of “ombudsman.”)
In an email, Hemphill said, “An Ombud will be able to serve as an advocate for our communities to ensure our frontier and rural communities have a voice at the federal, state and local levels of government. This will lower barriers and create genuine, sustained equity and opportunity across New Mexico.”
Another Hemphill-Diamond collaboration, set aside for now, considered easing requirements for anesthesiologist assistants to practice in rural areas.
The districts Hemphill and Diamond represent define rural. They cover five whole counties in the southwest corner of the state and part of two others
Another rural development is creation of Naat’áanii Development Corporation to be the Medicaid managed-care organization for the Navajo Nation. After 17 years of development and a bazillion bureaucratic hoops, the NDC is almost in place, lacking only the authorization of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham. Seth Damon, Speaker of the Navajo Nation, explained the situation in a Jan. 24 Albuquerque Journal op-ed. As of this writing, Feb. 5, the requested authorization has not happened. C’mon, governor.


© 2021 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES  1/25/21
Legislature plows ahead with its work
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Amid scrambling and shuffling dealing with security and disease, the 2021 legislative session began Jan. 19. Senate sanity appeared with the appointment of Gallup Democrat George Muñoz to chair the Finance Committee. The appointment came from new Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, of Albuquerque, who apparently went with her 26 years in the Legislature in avoiding some of the more radical senators.
The New Mexico Tax Research Institute and the Society of Association Executives joined Jan. 14 for a virtual version of their annual legislative outlook conference. Before reviewing conference highlights, a brief look at the session’s function seems useful. We all know this stuff, of course.
Our Legislature meets annually, alternating between 30- and 60-day sessions. The Legislature has one job: pass a budget, which must be balanced, to operate state government. Anything else is extra: legalizing marijuana, fiddling with the minimum wage, fixing faded license plates, etc.
Functions done every year get paid for with “recurring” spending, which comes from the “general fund,” the state’s operating pot of money. For the current budget year ending June 30, recurring spending is expected to be about $7.2 billion. State government’s main functions, in descending order of spending, are public schools and higher education, which together get just over half of state spending; health and human services; public safety; judiciary; and, both with less than one percent of the spending, transportation and operating the Legislature.
Highways are handled separately. Legislative committees craft the final budget from two drafts, one from the executive branch (the governor) and one from the Legislative Finance Committee, a bipartisan group (such things happen!) that works between sessions. Revenue supposedly grows along a trend. Spending follows.
The conference starred Rep. Patricia Lundstrom, Gallup Democrat and vice chair of the Legislative Finance Committee; LFC Executive Director David Abbey; and Stephanie Schardin Clarke, Taxation and Revenue Department secretary. (That Gallup is home to the legislature’s financial heavyweights, Muñoz and Lundstrom, presumably is coincidence. Something in the water?)
Lundstrom set the scene. The gloom of the June 2020 special session has eased, in no small part due to federal money. Without those dollars, in the current budget year (FY 21) ending June 30, the state would have needed to hit the reserves to the tune of nearly $1.1 billion and/or “face damaging budget cuts,” Lundstrom said. Revenues around $7.4 billion are forecast for next year, giving the Legislature about $169 million more than is allocated this year. In legislative jargon, this figure is called “new money.” (The assumption here is that recurring spending recurs; the broad functions change little from year to year.)
Reducing spending always is damaging.
Actions during two special sessions last year created strong financial reserves and approaches to accommodating the wild volatility of state government revenue from oil and gas production. As a bonus, more revenue appeared than was expected in June.
The LFC’s recommendation for infrastructure spending (buildings, roads, jails and much more) starts with $250 million for transportation and $20 million for broadband expansion.
While oil production revenue, such as severance taxes and federal royalties, directly affects state government, the activity ripples through the state with gross receipts taxes on drilling work and income taxes on firms and employees. Drilling activity is recovering from the 70% drop last spring.
Abbey made yet another plea for gross receipts tax reform. Broadening the base and cutting rates would do all sorts of good things.
A change coming July 1 will be municipalities getting gross receipts taxes from internet sales.
Schardin Clarke said her department will ask the Legislature for nearly 40 tax operating changes including removing the five dollar minimum penalty for late filing of corporate income taxes.
Little things count.

© 2021 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     1/11/21
Reshape southern congressional district to favor Democrats? Absolutely, it will happen
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Ordinarily people pay little attention to the numbers on the various governmental districts where they live. Nor do they pay attention to the district’s shape. Nearly all the time little reason exists to occupy one’s mind with these details. Much else matters more, like dinner.
Giving attention to the shape of districts, such as Congress, state representative and senate, Public Regulation Commission, county commission, and on and on is very much an inside baseball activity. Those caring about these matters care passionately. Still, the details matter, however boring and obscure.
A focus on electoral districts, numbers and shapes especially matters every ten years because districts are redrawn to reflect population change. Much is at stake – lots of money from the federal government and tilting political power until the next census.
In most states the Legislature runs redistricting, as the process is called. In some states, the work is delegated to an independent commission. New Mexico is one of those states with the greatest opportunity for skullduggery because one party, the Democrats, controls the players, the two houses of the Legislature, and the governorship.
Maximizing partisan advantage and producing funny shaped districts is called gerrymandering.
House Speaker Brian Egolf of Santa Fe tripped over his tongue in November when, the day after the election, he said the 2nd Congressional District would be redrawn as a result of Republican Rep. Yvette Herrell beating incumbent Rep. Xochitl Torres Small. The redrawing just might affect the outcome of the 2022 race for the seat.
Egolf quickly backed away from the comment after being rhetorically beaten by purists—oh, horrors, the purists said—and a non-purist, Steve Pearce, Republican Party chairman.
Rest assured, Egolf meant exactly what he didn’t quite say originally; to the extent the huge Democratic majorities in both houses of the Legislature can get away with it, they will manipulate the shape of districts to favor Democrats.
Iowa has had a nonpartisan commission for years. Our neighbors, Colorado and Arizona, ahead of us in so many other areas, have introduced independent commissions.
The Legislature has a redistricting website. Go to https://www.nmlegis.gov/Redistricting.
In the past courts have had heavy involvement in New Mexico’s redistricting. That’s bad. It comes because the Legislature has failed at its job, having gotten too clever. The files show the House and Senate district maps overall and then get detailed, down to the precinct level.
While a good many of the districts seem reasonably shaped, others get a little strange. House District 67 starts with Union County and drops south. A narrow band wraps around Clovis with some precincts south of Clovis. Not at all contiguous. District 50 wanders from south of Mountainair almost to Santa Fe.
Three senate districts (34, 41, and 42) divide Carlsbad. Roswell is split among three districts (27, 32, 33). Two precincts (84 and 85) poke to the east from District 33 into District 32, while just to the north, the process reverses. Two precincts jut west from District 32 into District 33. With today’s computers capable of shuffling district design in any direction, surely these oddities need not happen.
Retired New Mexico State University political science professor Jose Garcia,
in his Dec. 21 post at lapoliticanewmexico.blogspot.com, shows how collusion between the major parties has moved districts away from competitiveness in order to improve election chances of legislators and illustrates the results, none of them “good signs for the democratic health of the state.” Garcia’s solutions are redistricting done by a non-compromised blue ribbon, bipartisan commission that is told to maximize partisan competition in as many districts as possible.
Review Garcia’s posts. Redistricting is coming.

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES    12/28/20
Eight counties gain population; rural-urban divide deepens
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
 Estimates must start somewhere. The trouble is that the further the estimated figure gets from the starting point, the shakier it gets. The U. S. Census Bureau works very hard to deal with this problem so as to produce the best possible quality figures. We will take them at their word and look the 2019 county population numbers.
New Mexico’s estimated population for July 1, 2020, was 2,106,139. That’s an increase of three-tenths of one percent from 2,099,637 in 2019 and up 1.6% or 32,277 from 2010. “Hardly at all” seems the best description of the one-year population growth. The 2020 estimates for states appeared Dec. 22.
The population numbers tell an old story that we as citizens and our policy makers shouldn’t let slip away simply because few people are involved. Our rural-urban division is the story. The new message is the division gets more and more divided.
Eight of our 33 counties added population between 2010 and 2019. The reason, I suggest, is these eight offer people something to do, ways to earn a living and the chance their children might stick around. Four counties—Bernalillo, Sandoval, Santa Fe and Valencia—are home to just over half the state’s population. The 35,351 increase from three of the four more than explains the decade’s total population growth. (Valencia lost about 100 for the period.)
The Lea and Eddy county special case (because of oil) added another 11,000 people. Fortunately they support more than oil—cattle growing in both, Urenco in Lea, potash, WIPP and Carlsbad Caverns in Eddy. Lea County’s population peaked in 2015 at 71,746, dropped for two years and blipped back up in 2019. Eddy County grew steadily all decade. Still, my guess is that the two will show a population drop when the new census numbers appear in a few months.
A parallel change has been shifting political party registrations, New Mexico In Depth, an independent news website, reported recently. Decline-to-state (independent) voters are increasing everywhere but especially in the southeast with increases of 7.4% in Lea County, 7.4% in Curry, and 7.3% in Roosevelt. The percentage of registered Democrats dropped 10 and 11% in these three counties. Santa Fe continues to like the Democrats with only 1.8% growth increase in independents. In Bernalillo County, where Republicans were soundly trashed in November, the Republican registration percentage dropped 4%.
San Juan County continues leading county population loss as gas and coal suffer. For the 2010-2019 decade San Juan lost 6,245 people from its 2010 population of 130,203, a 4.8% drop. Grant, another natural resource-based county, saw a 2,385 population decline for an 8.1% loss.
The leading losers by percentage are the small population very rural counties, especially in the northeast. This has been going on for years and years. A band of decline crosses the state from Union County, population 4,059, loss 10.6%, to Hidalgo, population 4,198, loss 13.7%. De Baca County, population 1,748, led in population loss at 13.9%. Colfax County, down 13%, or 1,784, completed the 13-percent loss group.
These sparsely populated counties are becoming more and more empty. When our so-called leaders discuss the state, the first or second comment touches landscapes and sunsets, the beauty of both. But you can’t eat sunsets.
The Cooperative Extension Service at New Mexico State University has a bit of money ($300,000) from WalMart via the Southern Rural Development Center in Mississippi to begin building economic capacity in retail, tourism, hospitality and entertainment in seven population-losing counties. A business retention and expansion program will be part of the effort. It’s a start.

 © 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES    12/14/20
ACI changes name, offers economic plan with old and new
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Among the 13 construction projects recently getting awards from the Associated General Contractors New Mexico are ten from government and three from the private sector. The division—23 percent private sector, 77 percent public—are measures of our situation. Even the private ones involve government.
One private project, the Ten 3 Restaurant on Sandia Crest outside Albuquerque, likely occupies forest service land, giving it a substantial government presence. The public sector came with the money for the 107-unit Sterling Downtown affordable multi-family workforce housing project in downtown Albuquerque with county bonds, tax credits and trust funds.
The private sector has a big role in a government project, the Artesia Aquatic Center, with $3 million in seed money from four Artesia firms and more from individuals, an approach fitting that part of our world.
The New Mexico Chamber of Commerce has stepped into these contrasts and the turbulence of 2020 with a new name and an approach it calls, “Driving New Mexico’s Future: Empowering a Competitive Economy in a Post-Pandemic World.”
The long name for the approach neglects to say it is a plan for the New Mexico economy, but that’s what it’s supposed to be. On page one the document is called “strategic action plan.” One the back cover, it’s called a “strategic action agenda.” Plans and agendas are different. That much I remember from management jargon.
The chamber’s former name, “Association of Commerce and Industry,” came with the appendage, “Oh, by the way, we are the state chamber of commerce.” Awkward. The change is long overdue. 
We face two “current competitive challenges,” the plan says, starting with improving the business climate, workforce skills and infrastructure to better compete for new jobs and investments.
Challenge number two is growing the working age population to provide the bodies for those new and retained businesses. Discussion of the working age population ignores, as is the habit, our place among the states with the lowest percentage of the population working. Overcoming the education and cultural problems with these non-working people of working age will be a huge challenge, if ever attacked.
The plan offers six general topics with 17 fairly specific items for attention in bettering the state. Nine concern workers, and four want to lure new residents. Most of the specifics cite programs in other states. One specific—reviewing the gross receipts tax—should provoke a few smiles. Like been there and done that, many times, and to no avail.
The plan’s Dec. 9 debut presents a timing problem. The 2021 legislative session starts Jan. 19, a mere 41 days after the debut. The plan offers complex ideas. Complexity takes time. The standard legislator’s response to these ideas will be, “OK, tell me more.” That takes time.
The Legislature will have two hugely complex agenda items—COVID and money. All this in a body with a political conviction that shifted left in November.
A further complication is that the New Mexico Chamber is not neutral, however much it might protest otherwise. Some legislators will say, “Chamber of commerce… business… bad guys…”
The document emailed to me failed to say where to find another copy. Such information is usually at the front on page one or two or at the back. The document was emailed by a chamber staffer with the email of “@nmchamber.org.” The new website is nmchamber.org. The office address is 2201 Buena Vista Dr. SE, Ste. 410, Albuquerque, 87106; phone 505-842-0644.
Getting a copy, reading it, and thinking beyond the Legislature would be useful. This is a long term project.

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES        11/30/20
Economy is diversified, diversifying, and we should welcome oil and gas
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
From the cavern of our health and economic difficulties comes an old wail; diversify the economy. Actually the argument, well distributed to newspapers around the state, is for diversifying away from oil and gas, as if oil and gas hadn’t spent the last couple of years diversifying away from New Mexico after the brief happy boom.
The pitch is left-handed, from James Jimenez of Voices for Children and Oriana Sandoval of the Center for Civic Policy. They discuss the commodity nature of hydrocarbons, the associated massive gyrations in state revenue and the “fact” that for climate reasons hydrocarbons are evil.
Jimenez and Sandoval likely wouldn’t quite agree with that assessment.
Economic diversification is an old cry in New Mexico; snap your fingers and wonderful things will happen. The claim used to be that we needed less government in the state. That has disappeared. Now the villain is oil and gas.
Start with our economy already being diverse. Tourism includes the quite different activities of skiing, visiting galleries, making the stuff that goes into the galleries, national parks. We grow chile and cattle.
Things are happening. The state Economic Development Department has an Outdoor Recreation Division that issues many news releases and has helped create a few private sector jobs. The department commissioned a study that showed the Gila and San Francisco watershed in the southwest part of the state supports 3,900 jobs. Another release said the outdoor economy contributed $2.4 billion to the state’s gross domestic product. Of course the release overlooked our outdoor GDP being the smallest of the Rocky Mountain states.
The state’s pueblos—“Pueblo Nations” seems the proper term—have made National Geographic’s group of the world’s 25 coolest places to visit in 2021.
Stretodynamics Inc., of Delaware, has joined the list (surprisingly long, to me) of companies doing testing at the Spaceport America facility north of Las Cruces.
Sandia National Laboratories just announced getting six regional technology awards.
One technology went to BayoTech of Albuquerque which envisions local hydrogen production as a way to reduce the costs and help move to environmentally better hydrogen fuels. Another transfer was small solar cell research to mPower Technology Inc. of Albuquerque to advance the technology for homes, everyday objects, and space.
On Kirtland Air Force Base, the Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Directorate, has opened a $4 million Deployable Structures Laboratory for testing novel deployable space structures.
The private sector is responding. The big Netflix expansion is the latest.
Orion Center will be 122 acres at the southeast corner of Gibson and Girard SE, between the Albuquerque airport and Kirtland Air Force Base. The developer is Group Orion of Washington, D. C. The hope is for two million square feet for manufacturing, a multistory office and laboratory, and a hotel. Initial employment would be 1,000, growing eventually to 2,500.
Group Orion is a subsidiary of Theia Group Inc., also based in Washington, D. C. Theia is developing a satellite network, its website says, “to enable digitizing the entire earth in real time.” The manufacturing building would be used for making Theia’s products.
Thunderbird Kirtland Development Corporation’s MaxQ, set for 70 acres east of Orion Center, will include offices, hotels, retail and restaurant space. One advantage, the developers say, will be the ability to walk through a security gate for access to Kirtland.
A comment decades ago was that if Starship Enterprise was real, New Mexico components would be aboard. We’ve been in the space business a long time. Today we are building on that base.
Oil and gas will take care of itself, one way or another, through the machinations of the private sector, politics and the constitutionally required balanced budget.

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES    11/16/20
Bernalillo County GOP calls 16 point congressional loss a huge accomplishment
By Harold Morgan
New Mexico Progress

Unlike some past years, Republican candidates showed up for the 2020 general election. Like most past years, not much happened.
Still, showing up is the first step.
Just nine of the 46 Democratic seats in the House of Representatives lacked a Republican candidate. In seven of the seats, the Democrat got a free ride. Libertarians contested two seats. Only one Democrat in the Senate escaped. That was Sen. Bobby Gonzales of Taos, whose district includes Taos and Rio Arriba counties.
The race for the U. S. Senate was won by Rep. Ben Ray Lujan. Former TV weatherman Mark Ronchetti lost. Lujan is still not my guy. Aside: I wonder if voters considered Ronchetti’s  weatherman status credible, even with him having the appropriate college degree. What do TV weather people really do beyond dance around in front of a screen? That’s unfair, but that’s a possible perception. Lujan’s blackjack dealer history is long forgotten.
Ronchetti emerged as a candidate in January, about a year late for a first time candidate, even with all the name recognition from being on TV. The name bought Ronchetti a 16-point defeat (57 to 41) in Bernalillo County, his home. Ronchetti’s overall losing margin was six points, 52 to 46.
A Nov. 8 email from the Republican Party of Bernalillo County offers this astonishing commendation for Ronchetti’s effort. “As difficult as a U. S. Senate run in New Mexico can be, Mark Ronchetti accomplished an amazing feat with his excellent results.” Without the Libertarian candidate, Ronchetti might have a lost by a bit less.
The email designated as “a huge accomplishment” the 16-point loss by Michelle Garcia Holmes in her race for Congress. Alexis Johnson had even less success in her race to replace Lujan in Congress; she lost by 18.
We shouldn’t overlook the Public Regulation Commission. Republican Janice Arnold-Jones lost by 20 points to Democratic incumbent Cynthia Hall. In the other PRC race, Libertarian Christopher Luchini got 28 percent of the vote against Democrat Joseph Maestas, suggesting voters might have preferred a more substantive alternative to Maestas.
Sen. Peter Wirth of Santa Fe is the Senate Majority Floor Leader. This month he was the majority leader with 82 percent of the vote in his reelection effort, the highest percentage among Democrats. Yes, there was a Republican on the ballot. Another Santa Fe senator, Nancy Rodriguez followed with 80 percent of the vote in race. Two Democratic senators with slightly smaller margins serve the area near the University of New Mexico. They are Antoinette Sedillo Lopez with 78 percent and, with 77 percent, Gerald Ortiz y Pino who is the oldest senator at 78.
Ortiz y Pino’s opponent, Lisa Meyer-Hagen, did campaign. She went door-to-door talking to voters. She sent promotional literature through the mail. But there wasn’t near enough campaign to get voters’ attention. That takes time, a year or more, and a lot of money against a well regarded incumbent such as Ortiz y Pino.
Sometime candidates are placeholders. The name appears on the ballot in case an opportunity appears later for a serious candidate. The other guy may die, a national political figure crassly observed some years ago, or do something stupid. It happens.
A serious candidate must be presentable (some of the Republicans weren’t), be willing to do the huge amount of work required of a candidate, and be able to find sufficient money.
An email from the state Republican Party the day before the election said, “Tomorrow we vote Republican, tomorrow we Save New Mexico.” That didn’t happen. Voters need a reason to support a candidate. Having such a reason and communicating it requires more than showing up

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     11/2/20
‘Greatness of beauty’ in NM but oversized services, state and local governments
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Two new (new to me, anyway) approaches to framing our thinking about New Mexico came from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s recent New Mexico Economic Forum. Both approaches are economic; one is policy.
The fed’s Nicholas Sly said New Mexico’s concentrations of state and local government employment and of service industry activity are both higher than other states. These pose special challenges to the state. A number of New Mexico’s risks are unique as compared to the rest of the nation, he said.
Considering the state’s situation surfaces a long conversation with a present state representative, who is a solid liberal. The difference between us, she said, is for solutions to policy matters, she chooses the public sector, and I choose the private sector. Well, yes. And that won’t change with the 2020 election.
But public sector spending will drop, which will have a greater effect here than in places where these government sectors are smaller. The Democrats solidly dominate state government and will continue to do so, despite a valiant Republican effort that is blocked by lack of money and the bizarre genius of President Trump. Whether there will be unique thinking applied to the special challenges, we’ll have to see.
Service industries are most easily defined as not manufacturing, mining or construction. Services are trade, transportation, professional services such as accounting and consulting, tourism, and finance. Call centers land somewhere in services.
New Mexico’s declines are most pronounced in the service sectors, though general merchandise has been hurt less; Spending for accommodations (hotels) and food are down just over 40 percent through mid-September from January. Arts and entertainment are down around 65 percent, with clothing and general merchandise stores holding fairly well, all things considered, down less than ten percent. Allen Theaters of Las Cruces is the latest casualty with all 11 theaters closing recently.
People losing jobs are giving up, not seeking new jobs. Our labor force participation has dropped 5 percentage points in 2020—from 59% to just over 54%. People unemployed for a long time tend to lose employment skills, occupational licenses and knowing how to show up every day and interact with other employees.
Economic forecasters lack a feel for the coming new normal, which obviously depends on the pandemic. Short term forecasts have a 25% variance between the average of the ten most optimistic and the average of the ten pessimists.
These economic events will happen in the unusual environment that is New Mexico. Analysts, your columnist included, struggle to adequately describe this environment. “Land of Enchantment” has never quite gotten there. English writer D.H. Lawrence, lured to Taos by Mabel Dodge Luhan, gets closer. Lawrence’s three years in New Mexico were the most consequential of the ten places he lived, writes George Scialabba in the October Commonweal magazine. Scialabba was reviewing a new Lawrence collection, “The Bad Side of Books.” The review was titled, “D.H. Lawrence, Arch-Heretic.”
Lawrence said, “New Mexico was the greatest experience from the outside world that I have ever had… The moment I saw the brilliant, proud morning shine high up over the deserts of Santa Fé, something stood still in my soul.... In the magnificent, fierce morning of New Mexico one sprang awake, a new part of the soul woke up suddenly, and the old world gave way to a new. There are all kinds of beauty in the world, thank God.... But for a greatness of beauty, I have never experienced anything like New Mexico.”
Think about that. “Greatness of beauty.” The trouble is, it’s tough to eat beauty.


© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES   10/19/20
Viante taking new approach to search for common ground solutions
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
When you are onto something, but not quite there, go to Plan B. Rethink the approach.
Viante has shown there exists in New Mexico a continuing desire for approaching the broader public policy issues facing the state.
This desire is not new. In the mid-1980s a number of groups were talking about dealing with New Mexico’s future. Sens. Jeff Bingman and Pete Domenici forced the discussions together into what became New Mexico First. Later Fred Nathan founded Think New Mexico. The two groups’ successes, to be polite, are modest, in my opinion, though Think New Mexico can cite the most accomplishments. Think New Mexico’s long donor list ratifies the desire to do something. People will back that desire with money.
Still, as if often repeated, New Mexico remains at the bottom of the lists. Enter Viante. Start with the name; it comes from Latin. Drawing upon the classics always warms my heart.
When considering organizations or companies, the board of directors offers insight. Viante’s board has an important omission—people from the usual cast of characters in civic affairs around the state. Five of the ten directors are under forty, reminding me of one of the groups Bingaman and Domenici squashed into New Mexico First. These ten should bring fresh thinking. Only one of the directors looks old enough to be called “old.” The others seem to be runners with MBA degrees and small children.
In 2017 Dale Armstrong was new to the legislative process. He went to Santa Fe during the legislative session to support business-related legislation and to learn about the process and support his wife, Gail Armstrong, a legislator. He was amazed and not in a good way. After some thoughts about moving to Texas, Viante was the result.
Rhiannon Samuel became the staff. To start, Viante did a scorecard, rating legislators on 15 bills under the broad categories of education, crime and quality of life and also on whether legislators show up to vote, which, after all, is the ultimate responsibility of an elected official. The idea was that specific legislation would percolate from the ratings. It didn’t happen, repeating the experience of New Mexico First and the Domenici Institute. (Think New Mexico does push specifics.)
The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to rethink. Thus Plan B—survey the policy horizon and develop legislative proposals to strengthen the “common ground” solutions that will improve life for all New Mexicans. The approach is simple, though difficult; talk to people, see what’s on their mind. It’s a kind of ultimate networking approach, starting with Rhiannon Samuel’s network and the networks of the Viante board. Identify involved groups and seek referrals from the groups.
Viante has some advantages in this gargantuan task. To start, none of the usual civic suspects are on the Viante board – no chambers of commerce, no trade associations, only one lawyer (and he’s retired), and no lobbyists. The board members are business people—restaurant operators, architects, contractors, communications professionals. They can make decisions without the insular thinking and fear of political retribution that strangles action by the people attending Albuquerque’s biweekly powers-that-be meetings.
Even though the board members com            e from the private sector, there is no “business” agenda that sets up in opposition to, say, unions. Just those “common ground” solutions.
As to proposals for the 2021 session, “it’s a bit fluid,” Samuel says. Uncertainty comes from COVID, the election and the state’s massive financial troubles. “Most of the conversations come down to money; what are we going to do?” Samuel says.
For the very immediate future—the Nov. 3 election—Viante has created a voting resources manual (https://viantenm.org/voting-resources) with everything you need to know about voting.

 
 © 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     10/5/20
Large uncertainties mean job growth might resume in 2025
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
When considering the state government financial situation, I’m a glass half empty type. Maybe even three-quarters empty. The good news about state revenues is that the black hole of projections from the spring isn’t quite as deep as originally thought by the state’s number crunching wizards. The bad news is that the hole remains quite deep.
A federal bailout is one reason the hole has gotten less deep. But that enables the state to continue kicking the can of any even half serious rethinking of state activity. Maintain those necessary services, for sure.
State number crunchers unveiled new revenue projections Sept. 30 for the Legislative Finance Committee. The presentations were a joint show from the Department of Finance and Administration and Taxation and Revenue Department secretaries and solitary from the LFC staff.
The LFC’s first statement that “significant uncertainty in the current outlook” meant projections were provided in a range, as in saying that recurring revenue might be between $6.4 billion and $7.3 billion for the current budget year (fiscal 2021) ending June 30, 2021. That’s down from 7% to 18% from fiscal 2020.
This is extraordinary. Projections are always in a range; that’s the nature of statistics. But a number within the range typically is firm enough to be THE number. For this year, our wizards can’t say.
The uncertainties are large, the LFC said. Start with a possible virus resurgence this fall and during the winter. Indeed, we are ten days into fall as of this writing, Oct. 1, and the state’s rolling average of reported COVID-19 infections has more than doubled (to 207) since Labor Day.
The state economy was just barely above where it was ten years earlier, having endured a lost decade. Then, in April, the state lost 100,000 jobs. About a third of those jobs reappeared by August. The more important number is the 62,000 person, or 6%, drop in the state’s labor force from 957,000 in August 2019 to 895,000 in August 2020.
This would matter less if we had a robust participation in the labor force, but we don’t, usually landing in the bottom five. We had a big drop from low base. The drop may be larger than thought because the feds tend to under estimate job losses.
Businesses that are operating—all those restaurants trying to function with takeout and reduced capacity—may not make it. The leisure and hospitality sector was down 29%, or 29,000 jobs, for the August to August year. Business plans don’t usually account for being profitable on half of expected sales. Mining and logging sector employment dropped 30 percent, losing “only” 8,000 jobs that are much better paid than restaurants. This sector, mostly oil and gas, is the big hit to state revenue.
The status of the various federal employment support programs is more than uncertain—the federal paycheck protection program, additional federal unemployment support.
As all these issues interact with one another, the uncertainty builds, observed the state agency presenters.
A third of our 33 counties show unemployment rates less than 10%. Five are above 9%. Lea County, at 15.3 %, had the second highest unemployment, and showed the largest year-over-year decline in grow receipts tax collections, 29.4%, or $525.4 million, during the April to June quarter.
The number of wage jobs statewide is expected to drop around 4% this budget year and add about 2% next year, not quite recovering the current year decline. It will be 2025 before the state gets back to December 2019 job levels.
That means that come 2025, we will be starting the decade over.

 © 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES  9/21/20
Indian Country housing wrapped in BIA red tape
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Outgoing Sen. Tom Udall likes to issue news releases calling for things to happen in Indian Country, sometimes spotlighting institutional matters. The exhortations typically come without introduced legislation and budgets, so I’m not sure what the releases really mean except for the not insignificant moral suasion of a United States senator saying something. Most recently Udall gathered 13 other Democrats to sign a letter to the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission to, as the news release said, “expeditiously address the digital divide in Indian Country.”
Water infrastructure, cultural patrimony, housing grants, health care and wildlife corridors are among the topics of Udall’s news releases the past few months. Buying a house and enjoying the well known benefits of ownership is another matter of interest in Indian Country.
Wherever there is a house being purchased, paperwork is part of the process. The Center for Indian Country Development at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis has reviewed the mortgage paperwork process at the Bureau of Indian Affairs for home buyers on tribal trust lands. Production of the required Title Status Report (TSR) is slow, so much so that mortgages sometimes become unavailable and deals collapse. The Center’s report, dated September 9, is “Shortening the TSR timeline: A proposal to end delays that hinder Native homeownership.”
The problem, the center writes, is that “Certified TSRs from the BIA are required for underwriting trust land home mortgages and for selling those mortgages into the secondary market.” Selling the mortgage is vital because it frees up money at the typically local financial institution, allowing it to make more mortgage loans. Certified TSR’s cover all those items needed to show the title is good—the legal description, liens, past transactions—that a piece of land accumulates over time.
Note here that I’m writing from the center’s report, which says that sometimes procedures vary from tribe to tribe but does not mention New Mexico. Overall, the situation is that, “Housing shortages, trust land development, and equitable capital access are critical issues.”
The recommendations start with building on what the BIA does well. There is even a BIA handbook. Then have all BIA offices play by the rules, that is, comply with existing timelines and consider new statutory deadlines for title recording and certified TSRs.
Think about that. Passing a law is the recommendation for getting paperwork processed. That recommended law would have to go through the United States Congress, a serious time-consuming hassle. This tells me—the external person—that the problem is large. The BIA says things are fine.
There should be a secure online portal for the handling of all documents related to the transaction.
Various federal agencies including the BIA and Housing and Urban Development have housing programs in Indian Country. They should be required to talk to one another, perhaps via an interagency report card that would track delivery of the various programs, in particular the factors in delayed or abandoned deals.
Producing mortgage paper work is one of those matters given little thought by most of us; it’s in the background and supposed to work. The research and policy proposals are a big part of the Center’s job. “Our mission is to support the prosperity of Native Nations through actionable research and community collaboration,” the Center says. Being part of the Federal Reserve puts the Centers focus on the financial. My experience with Fed organizations is that Fed products are of the highest quality.
Mortgage title paperwork is stifled in the BIA bureaucracy, as, one might figure from Udall’s news releases, are a host of other matters. Udall’s released are to be commended. Getting something done would be a good next step.
 
 © 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES  9/7/20
ACI finds opportunity for Statewide Economic Strategic Action Plan
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress            
Crisis offers opportunity. That appears to be the logic behind the “Statewide Economic Strategic Action Plan” being developed by the Association of Commerce and Industry. The effort is worthy.
Nearly all of the talk about the economy in New Mexico is inane. Too much government! More recently, too much oil and gas! The Spaceport will be a great thing! (Maybe eventually.) The pablum of New Mexico First reports is close to humorous. As noted in my last column, economic development in New Mexico means, among other things, repairing the fronts of buildings in down Truth of Consequences. Wow.
ACI is the natural organization for such a project. It is statewide. It is the New Mexico chamber of commerce. “Business,” however defined, is the constituency.
Allison Smith, a lobbyist from Las Cruces, is the current ACI chair. Smith has a separate business, Roadrunner Capitol Reports, for tracking legislation. The first vice chair is Tom Briones, an Albuquerque lawyer who represents small and medium businesses. Last year’s chair was Sayuri Yamada, the government affairs director (i.e. chief lobbyist) for the Public Service Company of New Mexico.
The project will cost some money. PNM is the “lead partner” with Chevron the “premier partner.” Among the top 15 supporters, I saw only two financial institutions, both Albuquerque based, Nusenda Credit Union and Bank of Albuquerque. Not so long ago (well, 25 years ago, actually), with PNM, banks would have led support of an effort such as the ACI study. We would have seen Wells Fargo, Sunwest Bank (now Bank of America), First National in Albuquerque (now Bank of the West), Los Alamos National Bank. Let’s do credit US Bank as a major ACI supporter.
The project is worthwhile, even if nothing much comes from it. The worth will be from many people thinking about the state as an entire entity. I don’t remember a similar effort that was substantive happening for a long time. Under the Martinez administration in 2014, the Cultural Affairs Department did an excellent and thorough analysis of the “Creative Economy.” The report hit the shelf about 20 minutes after completion. But nothing has viewed the entire state. I hope ACI’s consultant, Economic Leadership of Raleigh, North Carolina, digs the art study off the shelf.
An online survey with four main sections, done last week, is part of the project. The survey asked “satisfaction” with 15 matters, including legal climate, business taxes, public safety, broadband, and quality of life. It says to pick the top five from 19 ultra broadly stated approaches that will help businesses—reduced business taxes, more access to capital, promotion of better health (rah, rah!). Pick three from a ten-item list of workforce issues, such as basic academic skills, childcare, and drugs and five top things state government might do from a 16-item list.
The project document is full of today’s business jargon, “deliverables… slide deck… supply chain disruptions… leadership planning session… leadership retreat… outreach strategies…”
To me, the most encouraging deliverable (that means a product) will be a “cluster analysis and a supply chain analysis of major industries statewide to identify opportunities for growth.” That almost sounds like figuring out major industries really work, just about my favorite topic. Over time, chile has been the working example. My work in this area has produced little interest and no actions. (Of course, it may have been the sales pitch.)
Finally, there will be “potential legislative and regulatory reforms” and “outreach strategies,” whatever those might be. For reforms, start with the state’s Constitution, the key to higher education change.
All by November.  

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES       8/24/20
Harris wants “environmental justice for all,” safer cosmetics products
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden chose as his running mate California Sen. Kamala Harris, a failed presidential candidate. The mainstream media swooned, as one would expect. Washington Post columnist E. J. Dionne said, Harris “was always the safest, most experienced, and most tested choice… Harris will create excitement…” She also checks all the demographic, identity politics boxes.
Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberley Strassel would be expected to be crabby about such rapture and she is, pointing out that the Harris presidential campaign was considered “one of the most bungled and disorganized presidential campaigns of this cycle.” The Harris campaign was “rightly skewered” by Democrats and the media after folding in December 2019, weeks before the Iowa caucus.
Outgoing New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall has provided a way to sort the he said-she said. The headline on Udall’s August 12 release said, “Udall, Harris Introduce Environmental Justice for All Act.” Udall’s timing was startlingly appropriate. Biden anointed Harris August 11, the day before. Udall’s headline is true, in a narrow sense. The headline implies that Udall led the effort, though it doesn’t quite say that. Gotta love those clever headline writers.
Udall’s release says he “joined” Harris and Sens. Corey Booker and Tammy Duckworth “to introduce” the bill. Sure does leave the impression Udall led the charge.
After listing eight aspects of the bill, the release refers to a one-page backgrounder that proved to be on the Harris Senate website (harris.senate.gov). Harris references two members of the House of Representatives by name, “dozens of congressional colleagues” and others, but no mention of Udall, Booker or Duckworth. With all the egos floating around, you would think the naming of names would be coordinated. So were the Harris omissions merely sloppy or on purpose? Neither would be good in a potential president.
The text of the bill clarifies matters. It is Harris’s bill. Udall is along for the ride.
The website backgrounder begins, “As our nation reckons with systemic racism, our fight for clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment cannot be disentangled from the fight for justice. Environmental racism fuels disparities in environmental and public health and its impacts can be seen across society. Systemic barriers, including redlining, intentional disinvestment, and unregulated pollution, have systematically had devastating impacts on communities of color.
“That is why we need comprehensive environmental justice legislation. All people have the right to clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment. But for too many, these rights are still unrealized. That injustice, and the cumulative injustices of housing, economic, education, and health care injustice, and others, mean that millions in America have been ignored by our government for generations.
“If we are to achieve justice for all, we must achieve environmental justice for all.”
Within the eloquence, Harris commits a rhetorical sin so common and unnoticed it’s almost a cliché. She says, “For too many, these rights are still unrealized.” Too many? For me, if there are “too many,” then a proper number exists.
The object of the 130-page bill, it says at the top, is “To restore, reaffirm, and reconcile environmental justice and civil rights, provide for the establishment of the Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice Compliance and Enforcement, and for other purposes.” There are more than 20 specific policy aspects, some quite specific, including four pages of detailed regulations of safer cosmetic products with a section on disproportionately impacted communities. Another section covers menstrual product labeling.
I didn’t find a definition of “disproportionate.” Defining “environmental justice” takes 85 words in paragraph 11 of section 3. Defining “environmental justice community” takes another 41 words.
Take a look. Amazing. Much more government. It’s on the way.  

 
© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES   8/10/20
Government distributes many small sums of money, to what end?
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
The body of citizens comprising New Mexico have a challenge, that being deciding what to do about the activities of state government and how to pay for those activities. Well, yeah, you might think. So what? We know that. More huge challenges remain.
The Legislature did what needed to be done in the four-day mid-June special session, robbing Paul to pay Peter and Peter to pay Paul. Some specific items were cut. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham vetoed some of those cuts. Our much bruised state spending can was effectively kicked again with no serious rethinking.
More must be done. More cuts, that is, not more vetoes of the cuts.
Like what? In general, new initiatives that came from the 2020 legislative session should be carefully reviewed with an eye to cancelling the program.
One example is the Outdoor Recreation Division of the Economic Development Department. Just after the current budget year began, it announced a grant program to, the news release said, “help residents improve access to outdoor recreation in their communities. This grant program focuses on conservation-minded shovel-ready projects…”
My memory is that the Obama administration found there was no such thing as a truly “shovel-ready” project for the Great Recession infrastructure projects. The outdoor grants will be from $5,000 to $25,000 with an equal match required. One suggested project is an outdoor climbing wall.
The Department of Cultural Affairs gives money to arts organizations. For the current budget year (FY 2021) the average grant to the 193 organizations is $5,531.89. That’s not much. Does the money really matter?
The Rio Grande Valley Celtic Festival Association of Albuquerque gets $3,909 to produce two festivals about Celtic stuff. As a Celtic person (my last name is Welsh), I assure you I don’t care about the festivals.
The Miniatures & Curious Collections Museum in Roswell gets $4,630 for workshops and “exhibitions of miniatures and curious collections.”
Clovis Community College gets $6,172 for performances and educational outreach activities “characterized by culture and gender diversity, accessibility, arts education, and high artistic quality.” Gender diversity in Clovis?
Not surprisingly, nearly all the arts grants go to Bernalillo County and points north. A few other small clusters show on the grants map: Las Cruces, Silver City, Farmington, Shiprock, Las Vegas.
The Economic Development Department’s LEADS (Local Economic Assistance & Development Support) grants will send $10,637 to downtown Truth or Consequences to somehow fill the many vacant buildings in the commercial district.
The Roswell Chaves County EDC will spread its $25,000 around to business attraction, retention, and expansion, and real estate and workforce development. All that dilution, plus a few more tasks not listed here, would seem take a toll on effectiveness.
Mountainair will spend its $2,730 on equipment to turn the village multi-purpose building into a functional training center. Three organizations will split $75,000 to support entrepreneurs working from home.
One opportunity might be to dump the bio income tax credit and the biomass corporate income tax credit. It extended this year via HB 146, sponsored by Rep. Javier Martinez, Albuquerque Democrat.
More opportunity should come from thoroughly reviewing the capital outlay projects reauthorized in HB 355. The winners include locomotive repair in Clovis and the proposed Route 66 visitor center in Albuquerque.
Deleting programs is difficult: Everything has a constituency. And power, jobs, and clientelism. 
The Republicans need to inventory these opportunities and develop a program for the election. The program would have a long list in order to spread the anger. It might work. Gov. Susana Martinez dumped the Commission on the Status of Women. The identity politics left went nuts. It stayed dumped.

 

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES   7/27/20
We will not return to a pre-COVID economy
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Committees of the Legislature like to travel during the summer. Moving meetings around during the interim (between sessions) officially allows legislators to become acquainted with the state’s quite different regions.
For the locals, it means talking to legislators without the expense of a trip to Santa Fe, a nice side effect when times are tight. The time required further reduces the nonsensical myth of a “part-time” legislature.
Community attractions are nice, too. Artesia may have the coolest downtown of the state’s small cities. And an outdoor dinner on a balcony in Taos Ski Valley is a time to be cherished.
Summer is the time for new concepts, visiting informally with legislators and putting potential statutory flesh on ideas.
These attractions help offset the environment when the news is uniformly bad, as it was
At the start of the Legislative Finance Committee’s semi-virtual Cloudcroft meeting last week.
The news: The economic disasters from the COVID-19 virus and the oil collapse mean that the state faces a lost five years.
Concepts and numbers came from retired New Mexico State University economics professor Jim Peach. The forecast and more numbers were from Jeffrey Mitchell, director of UNM’s Bureau of Business and Economic Research, which operates an economic model that is a key part of state government’s revenue forecasting.
The questions and comments from legislators, some in the room, some not, had a theme—more information, quickly, about daily developments. Simply watching the governor’s weekly news conference isn’t adequate. Sen. George Muñoz, Gallup Democrat, said legislators need faster information “so we can be prepared when our constituents call us.” Constituents stop them in the grocery to ask what’s happening. Muñoz also cited another theme of some legislators—cutting government. 
“A common question I get,” Peach said, speaking from Las Cruces, is when are we going to return to the pre-COVID economy. “We’re not going to recover” during 2020 and 2021 was his starting response, “The simple answer is that we cannot and will not return to a pre-COVID economy. The world will be different. Our lives will be different.” The effects will be as profound as past huge crises—World War II or 9/11.
The oil and gas industry will not get to the previous employment levels, if only because productivity improvements mean producing hydro-carbons with far fewer people. As compared to 2014, Peach said, in 2019, “the state produced 2.7 times as much oil with a few more rigs and slightly fewer jobs.”
Oil production will remain well under 2019 levels through the end of 2025.
Of the big general job sectors, leisure and hospitality has taken the biggest hit with 24,981 unemployment claims registered, 20 percent of the total. This sector contains the restaurants we’ve heard so much about, plus hotels and other businesses central to tourism. Health and private educational services is next with 15 percent of the claims, followed by retail with 12 percent. Mitchell listed a number of reasons behind the uncertainty of the unemployment numbers including not counting the self-employed.
Overall, retail has been weak for ten years, Peach said.
Albuquerque should achieve 2019 job levels by the end of 2024. The state will hit that level in 2023. It’s bleak for Farmington, which is expected to flatline at 94.5% of the 2019 employment. Income gaps will widen, Mitchell said, requiring in turn more healthcare and social assistance. 
Peach mentioned that education is a huge part of the economy.
A legislator asked Peach, “Why aren’t we figuring out how to cut spending?” Peach’s response, “State expenditures will have increased.” Education is one example. The next session will have to see new income streams or spending “drastically cut.”


© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES    7/13/20
A leader emerges, maybe, for race, inequality considerations
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Attention has turned to statues. This makes some sense.
Rick Steves, in Sophia, the capitol of Bulgaria, a few years ago, observed that monuments, including a Lenin statue, have been moved to the Museum of Socialist Art. Steves, who has a PBS travel show, said, “Today, these statues seem only to preach their outdated ideology to each other. I love to visit places like this and think of the treasures we have in our freedom.” Reminder: That outdated ideology was the communist dictatorship.
More statues are coming down in the South in reaction to a movement called the “Lost Cause of the Confederacy” becoming an outdated ideology. This movement was behind monument building across the South in the decades around 1900. The rationale was that the confederates were the good guys, just outgunned.
The statue argument, in the op-ed analysis of retired New Mexico State University political science professor Jose Garcia, has “suddenly morphed into a mob led by fanatics determined to destroy public icons of 17th century colonial New Mexico.”
Garcia isn’t some gun-toting right winger. His mother was from Hagerman, his dad from Holman, near Mora. Garcia spent 13 boyhood years in South America. He likens our situation to a book burning in 1497 led by a fanatic Dominican priest, Girolamo Savanarola.
“We need those monuments, those stories. They offer us a glimpse of who we are, warts and all,” he says.
A potential leader has appeared. Consider a definition of leadership for an idea of just how amazing would be the prospect of a real leader: “Management is the capacity to handle multiple problems, neutralize various constituencies, motivate personnel... Leadership, on the other hand, is an essentially moral act, not—as in the case of most management—an essentially protective act. It is the assertion of a vision, not simply the exercise of a style.” This comment from Bart Giamatti came during April 1989. Former president of Yale University, he was Commissioner of Baseball at the time.
Chad Cooper, an Albuquerque financial analyst, has moved into the debate. He had to, I think. As an African American and the new president of the University of New Mexico Alumni Association, he had to become involved if he was to be credible. In the June issue of The Howler, the association’s newsletter, Cooper provided a profound and passionate meditation on racism and inequality. He met the difficult challenge of combining the personal with an analytical consideration of the long term.
With two UNM degrees, I have had little use for the alumni association, which has seemed only to celebrate UNM football, a bizarre concept. That might be changing.
Cooper said: “Now is the time for all of us to be better listeners to each other, be advocates for each other, and understand that the fight for equality is a marathon. We must continue to be vigilant and outspoken against racism and inequality long after this new cycle ends.
 “I see fellow New Mexicans greeting us and each other with kindness and respect. People have asked what they can do to help. Hopefully, this is the beginning of a major change and national dialogue around racism and inequality… if we are all willing to listen….
 “I am hopeful for better days to come, but those days will not come unless we all say that we have had enough.”
Cooper’s eloquence and position make him a leader of the state, part of the tiny group of people willing and able to consider the difficult broader issues facing the state. The association is a perfect vehicle; it’s neutral and statewide, really nationwide.
I hope Cooper asserts a vision. New Mexico needs one. I also hope he includes the Aggies.

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     6/29/20
Tulsa reconciliation didn’t need Trump
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
New Mexico has plenty of Oklahoma connections, most recently the closing for the summer of the Philmont Scout Ranch just outside Cimarron. In 1922 Tulsa oilman Waite Phillips made the initial purchase at the site and gave it to the Boy Scouts of America in 1938.
In the 1950s and 60s Phillips’ namesake oil company, Phillips Petroleum Company, headquartered in Bartlesville, west of Tulsa, was one of the large operators in the Ambrosia Lake uranium boom along with Kerr McGee of Oklahoma City.
The University of Tulsa has joined the crowds pounding University of New Mexico in football.
Pat Hurley, Herbert Hoover’s Secretary of War, was born near Tulsa and, as a New Mexico resident, had a thing about running for the Senate against Sen. Dennis Chavez. Another political connection comes through Rep. Brian Egolf, Santa Fe Democrat and Speaker of the House, who was born in Oklahoma City as I was. His grandfather, William Egolf, probably knew my parents at Classen High School in Oklahoma City.
This long-winded introduction is provided to say it’s worth stepping from our usual topic boundary of the New Mexico border to consider the Tulsa Race Massacre of May 31-June 21, 1921. White mobs destroyed the Greenwood district, an African American enclave north of downtown, killed as many as 300 people, and left 10,000 homeless. A long and moving Wikipedia article gives the details.
Somehow the massacre was scrubbed from the civic consciousness for around 70 years. My Tulsa source, a member of today’s civic elite born in Tulsa in 1942, remembers he didn’t begin to hear about the massacre until after college, around 1970. It wasn’t mentioned in the schools. The event got attention starting in the mid-1990s. “Riot” was the 1990s term.
My maternal grandparents were in the area at the time, if not in Tulsa. So was the maternal grandfather of my ex-wife. This makes it a bit personal. I better appreciate what some Navajo people told me at Bosque Redondo (near Fort Sumner) at the event commemorating the 150th anniversary of the June 1, 1868, signing of the treaty releasing Navajos from the concentration camp. They could feel their ancestors’ spirits, the Navajos said.
Tulsa has created what appears from the website to be an admirable truth and reconciliation commission.
Questions remain as to how and why the event was lifted from the civic consciousness. The why seems obvious: embarrassment, regret. But how? The Wikipedia article tried to blame planners, a group known for pursuing ideologies. The planner plan, which did happen, was to build a rail hub on the Greenwood site. But planners work for people such as mayors. Mayors in turn work for and are part of the core group that runs any community, especially smaller ones.
I speculate that the core group convened a meeting, maybe in a conference room at the biggest bank. Or the country club. Or the biggest oil company. The two or three leaders of the core said, “Boys, this is the way it’s gonna be.” The school superintendent, if not in the room, would be instructed that all mention of the massacre would be eliminated from the curriculum.
The legacy will change from silence. School curriculum will include the massacre by next year, Tulsa 2021 hopes.
Tulsans heavily favor President Trump, my local expert said. Even so, Tulsa’s reconciliation work didn’t need Trump’s recent visit that drew 6,200 in the humidity and heat to non-socially distanced quarters in the 19,000-capacity BOK Center.
Nor did even-hotter Phoenix need the President to pack a crowd into a mega church a few days later. Of course, it’s a dry heat in Arizona.


© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES    6/15/20
Assume responsibility for spending binge and don’t wait for feds
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
There’s a lot of moral injury going around. The concept applies immediately to healthcare workers and cops—people “who are strung out, stretched to the breaking point,” writes Peggy Noonan, Wall Street Journal columnist from New York City. Some of us have it relatively easy with an income to cover the bills and things to do. Others, not so much, especially in McKinley and San Juan counties.
Our Legislature faces a huge challenge in the special session starting June 18. To be sure, the challenge is modest compared to medical and law enforcement personnel, but still huge.
The good news is general and extends to the future; Permian Basin oil production growth will return “by next year and continue through 2030, consulting firms Rystad Energy and Wood MacKenzie estimate.” The Permian, the Wall Street Journal continued, will be “the central spot for new U.S. oil investments.”
Rep. Nathan Small, Las Cruces Democrat, thinks the special session won’t require radical actions. “Some budget cuts are needed,” he allowed in an op-ed.
The $1.25 billion in federal stimulus money will save us, Rep. Small thinks. That hope, if fulfilled, would allow us to cop out of responsibility for the spending blowout of the past two years. Add the wondrous leadership of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham.
Small also sees all sorts of “innovative ideas” appearing. Not a chance. Innovation, no. Solvency, yes.
The people—that’s you and me—will be kept from the capitol—during the special session. That’s not good, but necessary, I think. Still, that leaves us depending on our much disparaged (by the left) citizen legislature. We will have to talk to our representatives and senators during the election, especially those beleaguered few who have opposition.
The Legislative Finance Committee, reporting June 10, estimated general fund balances “without any changes” will be 8.8 percent negative as of June 30, 2021, the end of the coming 2021 budget year. That’s $1.98 billion under December’s estimate. The recurring revenue for the 2022 budget year is forecast at $1.4 billion less than recurring appropriations. “However, in hindsight, 7.5 percent general fund appropriations growth for FY21 was excessive,” the LFC remarks. Something—several somethings—will be done. 
These comments come from the handouts at the LFC’s June 10 meeting. The Staff Solvency Framework is a 63-page challenge with mind-bending detail. The approach “focuses on simple, straight forward, moderately austere options” for the current year and FY 21. The limited time for the session and the depth of the financial hole means fancy stuff won’t appear. Rep. Small’s “innovative ideas,” whatever they might be, come to mind. The administration and the Legislature, through interim committees, will devote the next seven months until the 2021 legislative session to our new future.
Part of the framework is a 78-item list of capital projects for which there is no money set aside, no money spent, too little money allocated and which are non-compliant. Projects include work on the Chief Theater in Mora, schools, an Albuquerque RV park, and a road from Santa Teresa and Sunland Park.
“Sanding” is the budgeteer’s word for a little off the top. The framework offers numbers for 2, 4, and 6% sanding. There will be less hiring. Some new programs will be dumped due to future revenue limits.
As is customary, the state’s forecasting group does a baseline consensus forecast with optimistic and pessimistic alternatives. The consensus sees it taking four years to return to the job levels of the early 2020 bounty. Overall, “rapidly evolving economic conditions place significant uncertainty on the depth and duration of the decline.”

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     6/1/20
Use of “disproportionate” leaves out respect
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
“Ideas have consequences. Words really matter,” reads a note on my office wall. The attribution is to David Brooks, New York Times columnist and Public Broadcasting pundit.
New words creep in to alter the dialogue. I don’t know the source (or sources) of the new words, but somehow, suddenly, it seems, a given new word is everywhere, something like Chicken Man. I suspect there is a gnome in the basement of the New York Times or Public Broadcasting who invents these things and distributes them to the talking head glitterati.
Consider “shutter.” Organizations are closing these days. “Shutter” has become the word of choice. “The firm is shuttered,” the story says. A little internet searching showed me hopelessly lost from the vocabulary view. Shutter, as in “to close,” is fraught with entries and definitions.
I once asked author Tony Hillerman about his word use, which was spare, as compared to his friend Norman Zollinger, who used many words. Hillerman said he always sought the correct single word. When one word worked, he didn’t want two.
In debates, if you use the other candidate’s words, you have already lost because you are trying to debate on the other candidate’s turf. Twenty years ago, the policy debate was about “smart growth.” The good guys called their organization, “Smart Growth New Mexico.” End of debate.
In considering this column, it registered that people today don’t talk in public about religion. They talk about faith. That seems a way to avoid “religion.” Yet religion was the base of this country’s founding.
Words become phrases. An individual is not “divorcing,” the individual is “going through a divorce.” Or a person is not “homeless;” the person is “experiencing homelessness.”
“Disproportionate” is one of today’s words. As it is a long word, the meaning is obscure. Properly used, in my opinion, “disproportionate” is a statistical term, meaning, I think, that something like COVID-19 is having greater impact in some places than in other places. As an awkward bonus, “extra disproportionate” appears sometimes.
A feeling nags that this description is a concentrated cultural phenomenon. This sense stems from the identity of those mostly throwing around the word “disproportionate,” that is, liberal national media, even the Washington Post, and those more to the left. The further nagging notion is one of moral outrage from the self-appointed activists.
For what it’s worth, nearly 80 percent of the people in McKinley County are Native American, the Census Bureau reports. In Cibola County it is 43.8 percent and 41.1 percent in San Juan County. These are the three counties hardest hit by a huge margin by COVID-19.
Another element—lack of respect—seeps through the outside reporting that I have seen about the Navajo Nation and other tribes. 
Respect is what counts with native people. I got that lesson on a hot day in Grants in July 2008. The meeting was about designating much of Mt. Taylor as a Traditional Cultural Property. The speakers from Acoma, Laguna and Zuni Pueblos, from the Navajo Nation and the Hopi Tribe, started with a few words in their language, then shifted to English and said the meeting and the TCP designation were all about respect.
OK, I thought, you have my attention.
At the 2018 treaty signing commemoration held at Bosque Redondo, Joseph Nez, now Navajo Nation president, spoke of resilience, reconciliation and telling young people the story. He said, “We have to teach this dark time in our history. It’s for all people to know that we can change. This is not just a Navajo story. We’re all survivors. This is a Southwest story. We need each other.”
Yes, we do.

 © 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES   5/18/20
A conservative sensibility would help special session
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
A legislative special session is necessary to deal with the humongous blows to the state’s previously forecast revenue for the 2021 budget year that begins July 1.
The revenue situation is so uncertain and perilous that the state’s consensus revenue estimating group has done a preliminary review of the economic and financial situation. It’s ugly.
The budget for the coming fiscal year (FY 21) was built on a forecast of $7.9 billion in recurring revenue. The review reckons revenue will be between 22 percent and 30 percent less and will wipe out the reserve funds that brought joy in February. Legislators will be required to do what elected officials hate to do: Say no.
My first guess as to what the session will not do is emphasize boring mundane stuff at the expense of cool stuff.
The state’s faded license plates are a boring mundane infrastructure item that may exist as a tiny flicker in the back of the legislative mind. Way back when more boatloads of oil money were anticipated (two months ago), I was set to argue that the state should pay for new and visible plates for everyone. I saw a city bus recently with a totally faded plate. But, whatever, that plate has been faded for a long time. Infrastructure, physical and institutional, holds the society together, providing the base.
By contrast, movies are cool. My guess is that the state’s money-losing production subsidy will be handled delicately.
What I’m sure is way out there is the claim of James Jimenez, executive director of Voices for Children. In a May 6 news release, Jimenez, a career public finance professional, said, “With federal relief and the state’s record-high reserves, New Mexico is well-positioned to make a few minor budget adjustments in the June special session.”
A few minor budget adjustments? Uh, no.
What would be nice but simply doesn’t exist in the conservative realm in New Mexico is a conservative sensibility like that of political commentator and baseball philosopher George Will. A couple of years ago Will observed, “In baseball, as in the remainder of life, the most valuable rules are unwritten.”
Will’s new book is “On The Conservative Sensibility.” Reviewer James Piereson, a senior fellow at a conservative outfit, the Manhattan Institute, likes Will and his book. Piereson’s review was in The New Criterion. 
“This book’s primary purpose is not to tell readers what to think about this or that particular problem or policy . . . but rather to suggest how to think about the enduring questions concerning the proper scope and actual competence of government,” said the introduction.
The special session likely will draw on the lessons of the Great Recession of 2008 and following years. The approach was cutting a little bit of everything. “Sanding” was one technique. Think about lumber and sandpaper. Sanding smooths the rough edges and reduces the size of the lumber a bit. So it was with the budget. Sanding, plucking money from every conceivable budget hole, some actual reductions, and a lot of money from the feds got us through.
Solvency was the word of the day for several years. The Legislature, led between sessions by the Legislative Finance Committee, did an admirable job. It’s curtain call time now.
The special session scramble most likely will overwhelm any broader thinking. Still, thinks the naïve columnist, some lurking presence of the conservative sensibility approach to considering politics would be good. As the state “reopens,” remember that faith in technocrats’ ability to organize economic systems is a delusion.

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES    5/4/20
Santa Fe Institute offers classes seeking order in COVID-19 complexity
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
In a recent column I presented computer modeling as a straightforward process of defining relations with equations, assuming values for elements in the equations, and then letting the computer decide what happens under the assumed values.
The Santa Fe Institute has taken the approach much, much farther, a great public service. SFI has created a four-session course under the heading “Transmission: SFI Insights in COVID-19.” The course itself is “Complexity of COVID-19.” Complexity is what SFI does for a living.
The introduction, setting the scene, says, “COVID-19 has very quickly proven to be a terrifying demonstration of complex systems. We are all suddenly witnessing the consequences of deeply entangled systems.”
We see these consequences every day, even if just in the photographs of empty streets.
Transmission networks, usually obscured, are the paths along which one thing gets to another. For say, cancer or Alzheimer’s, the networks are complex. Unraveling the paths gets into genetics. For COVID-19, the networks are “rather simple” and part of everyday life. The virus goes from animals to people to more people through contact and then moves through transportation systems (such as a new passenger on mass transit) to business and social settings.
These systems are supposed to work; I remember being appalled at finding a fire hydrant that didn’t work. When these systems don’t work or work too well, as in the virus case, we can change the system. Social distancing and quarantine are system changes but within the system.
How to change the system? That’s where SFI comes in. Its mantra, its job, is, “Searching for Order in the Complexity of Evolving Worlds.”
A big problem lying under the scientific analysis and modeling is the mix of science and policy. The technical people— every epidemiologist, virologist, economist and anyone else providing scientific advice—want to be right and to be as specific as possible. Typically, the scientists’ best is a range of possibilities. The trouble is that the wider the range, the greater the chance of being correct, but the smaller the chance of being useful to the policy maker. And vice versa. A narrower range focuses a policy decision but is more likely to be wrong.
It’s a nice but wishful idea that the science be cleanly separated from the policy. The rope between useful policy guiding advice and being wrong is tightly strung. No completely right or wrong answer exists, as with most complex problems. Among the several states and among different communities, different approaches exist. The state of Georgia has one idea. Grants, New Mexico, has another. Sweden has yet another.
The necessary shift to online education raises an intriguing question: “Beyond facilitating science labs, arts, and sports, what exactly is the unique value of in-person education?” With limited in-person work, SFI shows one approach to higher education. Another approach, also located in Santa Fe, is the intensively in-person St. John’s College which now is doing distance learning.
Ultimately, control falls to the individual. Reading about the present conditions brings better information about our individual preferred approach.
More information is better. But there is an appropriate reflex against too much information, whatever might be the definition of “too much.” Massively pervasive tracking of the disease spread endangers our democracy.
We do have a lot of possibly available and handy big computer iron. New Mexico has about 10 of the world’s top 500 fastest supercomputers, including the Trinity supercomputer at Los Alamos, currently seventh fastest in the world. My guess is that these machines and the smart, talented people who run them are being put to work.


 © 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES     4/20/20
Equations, variables and guesses produce model results
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
Mathematical modeling gets headlines these surreal days. Actually, the results of running models get headlines. The models themselves get little attention.
The appeal to headline writers and their editors comes, I think, from models offering something definite—a number—as together we face the COVID-19 virus. A number in an awful situation is a headline writer’s grist.
A model projects a high death toll. OMG, we think, something horrible to worry about. Then the same model projects a lower death toll. Whew! Not so bad. In the headlines recently is the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington (www.healthdata.org), which created an early model (maybe the first) of the virus situation in the United States.
For some perspective, let’s drop back to Modeling 101. The following discussion shares my understanding, gathered from bits and pieces over a long time. The thoughts apply to situations beyond COVID-19, such as, say, climate change. The difference is that while virus models land in the headlines and generate questions, asking questions about climate models is forbidden or a sin or something because all climate details are settled, thank you.
A model presents something. Could be the plastic airplanes or ships I assembled as a kid in the ‘50s. Or maybe an auto manufacturer’s half-size prototype. Or a three-dimensional drawing, using a computer, of an auto part or a house. Or a set of equations, which is where it gets murky for many of us. In terms of actually doing the math, I hit the wall in calculus as a high school senior. My daughter brings hope; she majored in math and physics.
Equations are a way of saying something, expressing relationships. Instead of words, the statement is done using numbers and letters standing in for ideas. A simple equation states the relationship of oil revenue to the state’s general fund: (oil price) plus or minus $1 equals (general fund revenue) plus or minus $22 million. The oil price/revenue equation is easy because it is based on data. The relationship has a history.
Saying something more complicated requires more and more complicated equations. These more complex equations must start somewhere, namely with people. People might say, I think this result depends on three things (called variables) happening. The result might be producing a certain number of newspapers during an eight-hour work shift. One variable might be the number of pages in the issue relative to the maximum number of pages the press can produce all at once. Probably a press will have a maximum of pages it can produce while running full speed; more pages will mean a slower speed. Color will be another variable; more color use will mean fewer pages because part of the press must print the color. People will be a further variable; does everyone on the press crew come to work? If, say, just two of the three press crew people appear, can the two run the press and at what speed? Management makes some assumptions, guesses, that this is about what might happen.
Each variable will be expressed as an equation; each equation will affect the others. The more variables, the more complex it gets. Together the equations model the process. Necessarily the model will be on a computer. Change a variable such as population density and the result changes.
When things get really, really complex, as in the case of the coronavirus pandemic, making new assumptions can produce very large changes in the results.
One thing we all must remember is that the results from running a model are a range of numbers, much more than just one number.

© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES      4/6/20
Jobs: Good year in 2019 shows that we can grow again
By Harold Morgan

New Mexico Progress
“The way we were,” Barbra Streisand sang. “Can it be that it was all so simple then.”
Then was seven weeks ago. The legislative session ended Feb. 20 after doing what I called “Democrat stuff,” namely spending the gushers of money on all those “needs” ignored by Susana Martinez administration and filling those jobs left vacant but, clumsily, left on the books as authorized.
Then things changed. Yes, we know that, you say. The COVID-19 virus and oil. In price terms, oil, which especially affects New Mexico state revenues, is set for the worst year since 2003, reported the Wall Street Journal in the March 28-29 edition. The Journal’s prediction comes from a poll of 11 banks.
It is useful to review the 2019 revised average job figures, both to prod the memory and to think about where the state might be when things might be “all so simple.” The thing also to remember is that the state got lucky with the boom. For growth the past few years in travel and tourism, we benefitted from the now-ended national economic expansion and the “New Mexico True” marketing campaign that lured visitors and their spare money. Good news continued in January with a 13,400 job, or 1.6 percent, increase from January 2019.
Each year economists in the Department of Workforce Solutions review the previous year’s wage job estimates, add reports from sources releasing data after the original unveiling and produce new, presumably better, estimates that provide a benchmark for the coming year. The numbers, all annual averages, are in the January issue of DWS’ Labor Market Review newsletter
Overall, the wage job growth was 1.6 percent in 2019 over 2018. The original estimate was 1.7 percent, so the total percentage change isn’t much. The state added 11,600 jobs, 900 fewer than during 2018. Estimated government gains increased as the private sector estimates shrank.
Of the statewide sectors in 2019, manufacturing was revised upward by 4 percent or 1,100 jobs. Leisure and hospitality was cut by 3,300 jobs or 3.2 percent.
Metro Albuquerque and Santa Fe were the statistical winners from benchmarking. The Duke City was given another 3,200 jobs monthly, bringing the estimated 2019 increase to a decent 1.3 percent instead of a so-so 0.7 percent. Santa Fe’s monthly average job total grew 1,000 jobs to make the increase 1.7 percent instead 0.3 percent.
The wage job estimates were revised downward for the Farmington and Las Cruces metro areas. Las Cruces was cut 200 jobs per month or 0.3 percent. The Farmington estimate dropped 500 jobs or 1 percent.
The February jobs report showed continued good growth with 12,000 new jobs year over year. March was different. The new claims for unemployment compensation show that the job situation hit the wall during the week of March 21 with 18,105 New Mexicans filing for unemployment. That was more than 20 times the 869 filing during the week of March 14. Claims jumped to 28,182 the week of March 28.
The past couple of years show the state can grow, can produce more good jobs, even if concentrated in a couple of counties. The oil and virus blows show us yet again that depending on luck is a bad plan. Instead, we need hard work on the basics. Here’s one small example. The Labor Market Review reported that in Mora and Catron counties all of the out-of-school 16 to 29-year-olds were neither employed nor in the labor force. With 73.3 percent, Mora led in the percentage of young adults ages 20 to 24 who were unemployed.
Yes, these are small population rural counties. But we can’t write them off.


© 2020 NEW MEXICO NEWS SERVICES   3/23/20
Oil disruption will spark special session, and abandoned mines pose dangers
By Harold Morgan
New Mexico Progress

“A surreal juncture” was the phrase an email writer used the other day. Further comment on the   COVID-19 virus is best left to others because of the rapid movement of events. But things continue to happen. Two will get a mention—oil and abandoned mines.
The big picture of oil, gas and especially the shale business has gotten attention in this column, mostly through passing along national headlines about volatility and the fact that a whole lot of the companies, the small and mid-size ones especially, aren’t making any money.
While the Delaware Basin subset of the Permian may be the best basin ever, things have changed. The point is that our massive actual and proposed increases in state spending the past two years (the current budget year that ends June 30 and the next one) are built on forecasts, not cash. The forecasts no longer work.
On March 16 oil prices on the New York Mercantile Exchange dropped to $28.70 per barrel, a four-year low, reported the Wall Street Journal. “Oil is caught in a severe demand and supply shock, both of which have an uncertain future,” the Journal quoted JPMorgan Chase analysts. A new element, the Journal reported the day before, is a Russian “strategic campaign to cripple U.S. shale-oil production.”
A special session of the Legislature looms.
Mining comes from outgoing Sen. Tom Udall, who is closing his Senate career with reports, news releases, conferences and such about mining matters and Native American issues. The latter I applaud. Udall approaches mining from the view that miners are bad guys.
Udall’s March 11 release covered a new report, “Abandoned Hard Rock Mines” (www.gao.gov/products/GAO-20-238), from the General Accounting Office. Hard rock mining involves 11 minerals including copper, molybdenum, potash, silver, gold and uranium. Coal is a “soft” rock.
The GAO calls itself “the audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, (which) exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities…” That means the GAO works for Congress. Udall attached the GAO report to a March 11 release. The report was addressed to the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. That means Udall.
The abandoned mine situation seems a little like what my cousin the dentist observed decades ago about my wisdom teeth; Don’t bother them unless they bother you. Think Gold King.
The GAO took 21 months to do the report. It covered 13 western states including New Mexico.
Mine sites come with “features.” Apparently, though, there is no agreed definition of a “site” or a “feature.” This throws uncertainty into the numbers. Features can be mine openings, pits, buildings, and/or leftover materials called tailings. In addition to the physical and environmental hazards at a site, young men, alcohol and nearness to more populated areas can bring in the “stupidity factor.”
Four federal agencies found “at least” 140,000 features at abandoned mines on the agency’s land. The four were the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service and the Environmental Protection Agency. Of those, 67,000 might be safety hazards and 22,500 might be environmental hazards. Actual confirmed hazards are 6,439 for physical safety and 1,363 for environmental. While these numbers are large, the federal four think there might be another 390,000 problems not yet in federal databases. Then there are state and private lands.
From the 2008 budget year to 2017, New Mexico spent $4.3 million “to address” environmental hazards at abandoned mines and nothing on safety hazards, the report said. The feds spent $64.5 million.
Udall’s solution: a royalty to be paid by future mines and a reclamation fee for existing and future mines.